Panelists discuss how subsequent therapy after initial disease progression should consider patient symptomatology, biomarker testing through tissue or liquid biopsies, and potential treatment options including MET-targeted approaches or chemotherapy combinations.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Biomarker-Based Approach: Value of repeat biopsies (tissue or liquid) to identify resistance mechanisms such as MET amplification
Treatment Options: Discussion of MARIPOSA-2 regimen (amivantamab plus chemotherapy), VEGF inhibitors, and emerging antibody-drug conjugates
Histologic Transformation: Importance of identifying small cell transformation, which requires different treatment approaches
Notable Insights:
Dr Piotrowska: Advocates for tissue biopsies at progression when possible, stating “histologic transformation, particularly after osimertinib monotherapy... is still a real challenge” and can dramatically change treatment selection. She estimates MET alterations may be present in “25 to 30% of patients.”
Dr Dietrich: Noted that “both lazertinib and osimertinib are such good EGFR inhibitors that EGFR on-target resistance escape is incredibly rare.” He highlighted that the main treatment decisions affecting outcomes are made in the first-line setting, with later lines being “on the defense.”