Panelists discuss how the overall survival benefit from the MARIPOSA regimen (amivantamab plus lazertinib) with a hazard ratio of 0.75 and projected survival improvement exceeding 1 year represents a significant advancement that must be weighed against toxicity concerns.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Significant Survival Improvement: Analysis of the MARIPOSA trial showing amivantamab plus lazertinib leads to improved progression-free survival and overall survival
Statistical Impact: Overall survival hazard ratio of 0.75 with projected median overall survival exceeding 1 year
Comparison Considerations: Discussion of MARIPOSA vs FLAURA2 trial designs and outcomes
Notable Insights:
Dr Dietrich: Called the 12-plus-months overall survival improvement “very refreshing” and noted the “relatively flat trajectory as we move out further on the curve,” indicating durable benefit. He stated, “Breaking through 4 years of overall survival is one thing and...5-year landmark improvements...is also very, very significant.”
Dr Piotrowska: Emphasized caution when comparing trials, noting that MARIPOSA had “no crossover allowed” while FLAURA2 patients could access chemotherapy in later lines of treatment, making direct comparison of survival outcomes challenging.