Panelists discuss how conversations with patients about treatment options have become more complex and nuanced, requiring thorough explanation of efficacy data and adverse effects while adapting to each patient’s level of understanding and involvement.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Communication Strategies for Treatment Decision-Making
Key Themes:
Shared Decision-Making: Challenges in presenting complex clinical trial data to patients in time-constrained clinical settings
Patient Education: Balancing efficacy outcomes with toxicity profiles when discussing treatment options
Individualized Approach: Recognizing that patient preferences and knowledge vary significantly
Notable Insights:
Dr Piotrowska: “I think the best way to do this is to try to talk about it and then give patients a little bit of time to digest and think through these options, and maybe not make a final decision in that initial visit.” She also acknowledges that clinicians bring their own biases to these conversations.
Dr Dietrich: Notes the importance of recognizing different patient information needs, stating “Some patients are very informed...and some others are deferring more to me.” He emphasized that these discussions have become “significantly harder, both on the discussion about efficacy and the nuances of [adverse] effects.”