Panelists discuss how optimizing treatment duration, using local therapy for oligometastatic disease, and understanding the limitations of current biomarkers are important considerations in developing effective sequencing strategies for EGFR-mutant lung cancer.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Local Therapy: Role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligoprogressive disease
Maintenance Strategies: Questions about optimal duration of chemotherapy maintenance and amivantamab treatment
Treatment Sequencing: Impact of first-line therapy selection on subsequent options
Notable Insights:
Dr Dietrich: Supports local treatment for oligoprogressive disease, stating “depending on the patient in my practice, up to 6 sites are reasonable” for SBRT treatment. He believes “the impact of amivantamab or chemotherapy respectively is best when EGFR disease is sensitized by a third-generation EGFR [tyrosine kinase inhibitor] backbone.”
Dr Piotrowska: Expressed concern about biomarker-directed therapy, noting “we’ve taken a step back from that” with combination approaches where “we really don’t know which patients are likely to benefit from each.” She emphasized the need for better biomarkers to guide both frontline and later-line therapy selection.