Panelists discuss how genomic testing informs real clinical scenarios, demonstrating that for a 64-year-old healthy woman with a single positive lymph node, the 21-gene assay would guide treatment decisions, with cardiac assessment influencing whether anthracycline-based chemotherapy would be used if her score was high.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Changing patterns in breast cancer mortality by stage at diagnosis
Challenges in identifying high-risk early-stage patients
Future directions for research and treatment optimization
Key Points for Physicians:
Research findings show that 62% of patients who died from breast cancer in 2017 initially presented with stage I-II disease.
Current research focuses on identifying early-stage patients who need more aggressive treatment.
Questions remain about optimal treatment approaches (anthracyclines vs CDK4/6 inhibitors).
Notable Insights:
The proportional risk reduction from current treatments has been greater for stage III-IV disease than for stage I-II disease.
Clinical trial design faces challenges in asking the right questions rather than simply adding therapies.
Clinical Significance: Despite progress in breast cancer treatment, a significant unmet need remains in identifying and effectively treating early-stage patients at highest risk for recurrence and mortality.