Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Evolving Management With New Data From EHA 2025 - Episode 8
Panelists discuss how Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor selection requires careful consideration of patient-specific safety factors including cardiac comorbidities, renal function, infection risk, concurrent medications, and overall comorbidity index scores, emphasizing the importance of tailoring therapy based on individual patient profiles and preferences while recognizing that geriatric patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often have multiple medical conditions that influence treatment tolerability and logistics.
Selecting Among BTK Inhibitors—Patient Profiles and Safety Considerations in CLL
Safety considerations play a fundamental role in treatment selection for patients with CLL, particularly given that the majority of patients are geriatric with multiple comorbidities and concurrent medications. When choosing between BTK inhibitors and BCL2-based therapies, clinicians must carefully evaluate each patient’s cardiac status, use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, and renal function. Patients with significant cardiac disease or those requiring multiple cardiovascular medications may face increased risks with certain BTK inhibitors due to potential cardiac toxicity concerns. Similarly, renal function assessment becomes crucial when considering venetoclax-based regimens that require careful monitoring and dose adjustments based on kidney function.
Infection risk assessment represents another critical safety consideration that influences treatment selection across different patient populations. Various comorbidity scoring systems help clinicians evaluate patients’ overall health status and infection susceptibility, informing decisions about treatment intensity and monitoring requirements. Patients with compromised immune systems, multiple medical conditions, or previous infectious complications may benefit from therapies with lower infection risk profiles. The challenge lies in balancing these safety considerations with patient preferences regarding treatment logistics, time commitments, and desired treatment-free intervals while optimizing therapeutic outcomes.
Treatment individualization becomes increasingly important as patients progress through multiple lines of therapy, often becoming more medically compromised over time. Patients who have received previous treatments may have accumulated toxicities, developed infectious complications, or experienced decline in performance status that affects subsequent treatment tolerance. The selection process must account for immediate safety concerns and long-term treatment sequencing strategies, ensuring that chosen therapies preserve future treatment options while maintaining quality of life. This comprehensive approach to safety assessment, combined with patient preference discussions about treatment logistics and lifestyle impacts, enables clinicians to tailor the most appropriate therapy for each patient’s circumstances and medical profile.