Experts discuss key findings from the phase 3 CONTACT-03 trial investigating atezolizumab plus cabozantinib vs cabozantinib alone in inoperable advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, along with insights from real-world data on sequencing strategies and the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after prior ICI therapy.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Could you highlight key findings from the phase 3 CONTACT-03 trial investigating atezolizumab plus cabozantinib vs cabozantinib in inoperable aRCC after ICI treatment and other relevant studies?
What insights do real-world data and experience provide about sequencing strategies and the efficacy of TKIs after prior ICI therapy?
Real-world outcomes with cabozantinib after prior ICI
Are there any patients in which you consider immunotherapy rechallenge after progression on initial ICI-based therapy? How might you differentiate between rechallenging with PD-L1 inhibitors vs CTLA-4-based approaches?
What insights do emerging data, such as the TiNivo-3 trial, provide regarding this strategy? Phase 3 TiNivo-2 trial investigating tivozanib ± nivolumab after an ICI