Differentiating Treatment Options: Epcoritamab + R2 vs Tafasitamab-Lenalidomide-Rituximab in R/R FL
Panelists discuss how they anticipate differentiating candidates for epcoritamab + lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) vs those better suited for tafasitamab-lenalidomide-rituximab, considering the factors that most influence their decisions, and share their impressions of the EPCORE NHL-2 trial, including potential treatment sequencing implications between the 2 regimens.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
How do you anticipate differentiating candidates for epcoritamab[JS1] + R2 and those who might be better suited for a tafasitamab-lenalidomide-rituximab? What factors most influence your decision?
Feel free to share your thoughts on any differences and/or similarities in your impressions of the EPCORE NHL-2 trial, and potential treatment sequencing implications between tafasitamab-lenalidomide-rituximab vs epcoritamab + R2.