Updates in the Treatment of HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer - Episode 3
Current Practices for Targeted Therapies and Molecular Testing for HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
Panelists discuss how the latest NCCN guidelines for targeted therapies and biomarker testing in advanced/metastatic breast cancer highlight the importance of biomarker-driven approaches, with particular emphasis on the need for next-generation sequencing testing in the first-line setting, the implications of HER2-low classification, and how the recent FDA approval of a PI3K inhibitor may impact testing practices and treatment strategies.
Please briefly mention the latest NCCN guidelines for targeted therapies and associated biomarker testing.
How does biomarker testing differ in advanced/metastatic breast cancer from early-stage disease?
What should be considered when testing in the first line for advanced disease?
Is there a need for next-generation sequencing testing before first-line metastatic disease? (eg, BRCA, PIK3CA, PD-L1, NTRK, microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair deficiency, high tumor mutational burden)
Will the recent FDA approval of a PI3K inhibitor affect your testing practice?
For a patient whose cancer has progressed, do you obtain a new biopsy or go back to the original sample? Why?
How has immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing changed with the addition of HER2-low to NCCN guidelines?
How are you interpreting IHC staining results for HER2-low?
How are results reported? Are you given a percentage of staining, or are you given the category of HER2-low?