Panelists discuss how the NCCN guidelines recommend intensive chemotherapy options, including traditional 7+3 and CPX-351, for newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML patients, with treatment selection based on individual patient factors and potential adverse effects.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Please discuss the NCCN guideline recommended first-line treatment options for patients with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary AML who are potential candidates for intensive chemotherapy induction.
Please briefly review the study design & efficacy study of CPX-351 vs. 7+3.
How do you monitor and manage potential adverse effects in these patients?
Describe management of both 7+3 and CPX-351.
How does your approach differ between the two regimens?