2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Patrick M. Forde, MBBCh, assistant professor of oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, discusses the CheckMate-026 study, which demonstrated that first-line therapy with nivolumab failed to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in PD-L1–positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with standard chemotherapy.
Patrick M. Forde, MBBCh, assistant professor of oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, discusses the CheckMate-026 study, which demonstrated that first-line therapy with nivolumab failed to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in PD-L1—positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with standard chemotherapy.
Nivolumab-treated patients had a median PFS of 4.2 months compared with 5.9 months for patients treated with a chemotherapy doublet chosen by the treating physician. Overall survival (OS) and response rate also did not differ significantly between treatment groups.
In the second-line treatment of lung cancer in patients that have already received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, nivolumab does appear to prolong survival over chemotherapy. A lot of oncologists expected to see a similar finding in the first-line setting, says Forde.
It will be very important to look at the population of patients enrolled in the CheckMate-026 study and determine what characteristics of the tumor and the immune environment may have predicted or not predicted response to treatment. There is a lot of work to be done looking back at specimens from that trial to try and determine exactly why nivolumab did not improve survival in this study, says Forde.
Related Content: