Panelists discuss how the KARMMA-3 study’s design, patient population, and efficacy outcomes—including overall survival data—inform the approval of ide-cel, as well as the implications of CARTITUDE-4’s recent findings on treatment selection and approaches for cilta-cel in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Dr Ajai Chari to Dr Martin: Let’s dive deeper into the KARMMA-3 study that got ide-cel approved. Dr Martin: Can you please review the KARMMA-3 study design, patient population, and efficacy outcomes including overall survival (OS) data?
Dr Ajai Chari to Dr Callander: Now that we have discussed KARMMA-3, let’s review CARTITUDE-4. Dr Callander: Can you please review the CARTITUDE-4 study design, patient population, and recently presented IMS 2024 CARTITUDE-4 OS data updates