2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
On June 1, 2025, OncLive® convened a group of early career medical oncologists specializing in thoracic malignancies to discuss pivotal abstracts from the 2025 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2025). The session was moderated by Eric K. Singhi, MD, with faculty providing real-world perspectives on emerging therapies, treatment sequencing challenges, and evolving biomarker strategies. The discussion centered on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), targeted therapies for oncogene-driven NSCLC, perioperative treatment approaches, and novel diagnostic tools.
Session Overview and Highlights
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Advanced NSCLC
The TROPION-Lung02 study evaluating datopotamab deruxtecan plus pembrolizumab generated mixed reactions among faculty. While objective response rates were encouraging (»55%-56%), treatment discontinuation rates approaching one-third of patients raised significant tolerability concerns. Faculty noted that overlapping toxicities between immunotherapy and ADCs, particularly pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease, complicate clinical management and attribution of adverse events.
The introduction of AI-driven biomarkers through the QCS platform represents a promising development for patient selection beyond simple TROP2 expression by immunohistochemistry. However, faculty emphasized that stronger survival data and improved tolerability profiles are prerequisites for ADCs to earn roles in first-line treatment.
HER2-Targeted Therapies: An Expanding Landscape
Faculty expressed considerable enthusiasm for emerging oral HER2-targeted TKIs, particularly zongertinib and sevabertinib. Zongertinib demonstrated a 71% objective response rate in HER2 tyrosine kinase domain-mutated patients who were HER2 therapy-naive, with a manageable safety profile and notably no cases of interstitial lung disease. Faculty favored positioning oral TKIs before HER2 ADCs like trastuzumab deruxtecan to avoid overlapping pulmonary toxicities.
Sevabertinib showed similar response rates (60%) in both treatment-naive and pretreated patients without prior HER2-directed therapy, surprising faculty who typically expect different response rates across treatment lines. The consistency suggests robust HER2 dependency in this patient population, though concerns about cumulative diarrhea with sequential TKI use were noted.
Central nervous system efficacy remains a critical consideration, as patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC frequently develop brain metastases. Faculty emphasized the need for agents with proven intracranial activity to prevent disease progression in this challenging anatomic site.
Perioperative EGFR-Targeted Therapy
The NeoADAURA trial (NCT04351555) results showing significant improvement in major pathologic response (MPR) rates with perioperative osimertinib generated cautious optimism. Both osimertinib plus chemotherapy (26% MPR) and osimertinib monotherapy (25% MPR) significantly outperformed chemotherapy alone. However, faculty emphasized that pathologic response is a surrogate end point, and mature event-free survival and overall survival data are essential before changing practice patterns.
Faculty debated whether osimertinib should be used both before and after surgery, raising concerns about resistance development and cumulative toxicity. Real-world experiences with osimertinib making lung tissue “sticky” and potentially complicating surgical procedures were discussed, though the clinical significance remains uncertain.
KRAS G12C Inhibition in First-Line Treatment
The KRYSTAL-7 study (NCT04613596) of first-line adagrasib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising efficacy signals, particularly in patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 50%. However, the 68% rate of grade 3-4 adverse events and high pill burden raised significant feasibility concerns for real-world implementation. Faculty questioned whether the observed benefit was primarily driven by pembrolizumab rather than the KRAS inhibitor, particularly given similar outcomes to historical pembrolizumab monotherapy data.
The competitive landscape with other KRAS G12C inhibitors, including divarasib, was acknowledged, with faculty preferring to await phase 3 data before considering practice changes.
Novel Biomarker Approaches
A tissue-agnostic, genome-wide methylation-based circulating tumor DNA assay showed ability to detect treatment failure a median of 5 months before clinical progression. Faculty were most enthusiastic about using such assays for treatment de-escalation rather than escalation, given the challenges of interpreting positive results without radiographic progression.
Serial ctDNA monitoring is already being implemented by some faculty for scan interpretation and patient counseling, though they emphasized the need for prospective trial validation before widespread adoption.
Discussion Themes and Expert Insights
Faculty consistently emphasized the importance of quality-of-life considerations in treatment selection, particularly given the chronic nature of advanced NSCLC management. The pill burden associated with oral targeted therapies, infusion complexity of bispecific antibodies like amivantamab, and overlapping toxicity profiles of combination regimens were recurring themes.
Treatment sequencing emerged as a central challenge, with faculty acknowledging that optimal approaches remain unclear in many scenarios. The availability of multiple active agents creates both opportunities and complexity, requiring individualized decision-making based on patient factors, prior treatments, and toxicity profiles.
Financial barriers and access issues were highlighted as ongoing concerns, particularly for newer agents and complex combination regimens that may strain health care system resources.
Unmet Needs and Recommendations
Standardized approaches to biomarker testing and treatment sequencing are critically needed as the therapeutic landscape becomes increasingly complex. Faculty emphasized the importance of incorporating novel biomarkers into prospective clinical trials rather than relying solely on retrospective analyses.
The development of better supportive care strategies for ADC-related toxicities, particularly interstitial lung disease and cytopenias, is essential for broader implementation. Proactive management approaches were emphasized, including prophylactic measures for diarrhea with TKIs. .
Central nervous system activity must be a priority in drug development, given the high propensity for brain metastases in oncogene-driven NSCLC subtypes. Faculty called for dedicated CNS end points in clinical trials rather than post-hoc analyses.
Conclusion
The 2025 ASCO meeting highlighted the rapid evolution of NSCLC treatment, with multiple promising agents across different targets and mechanisms. While the expanding therapeutic arsenal provides new hope for patients, it also creates complexity in treatment selection and sequencing.
Faculty agreed that the field is at an inflection point where personalized approaches based on molecular profiling, biomarker-driven patient selection, and careful consideration of toxicity profiles will be essential. The coming years will likely see further refinement of treatment algorithms as survival data mature and resistance mechanisms are better understood.
Despite the challenges, faculty expressed optimism about the trajectory of NSCLC care, acknowledging that having “too many good options” represents a welcome problem in a disease that has historically had limited therapeutic choices.
References
Related Content: