2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Initial fruquintinib followed by regorafenib extended OS vs the reverse sequence of the agents in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
mCRC | Image Credit:
© Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com
Sequencing fruquintinib (Fruzaqla) before regorafenib (Stivarga)demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with the reverse sequence for the late-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), according to data from a subgroup analysis presented during the 2025 AACR Annual Meeting.1
At the March 1, 2025, data cutoff, patients who received fruquintinib then regorafenib (FR) in the overall population (n = 35) experienced a median overall survival (OS) of 21.2 months compared with 15.8 month in patients who received regorafenib then fruquintinib (RF; n = 18; log-rank P = .587). Additionally, patients in the FR group who received combination therapy (n = 17) achieved a median OS of 23.6 months vs 12.3 months in the RF group (n = 11; log-rank P = .167). The median OS among patients in the third line of treatment was 21.2 months vs 17.7 months in the FR (n = 34) and RF (n = 15) groups, respectively (log-rank P = .571).
“In the management of metastatic CRC, the selection of optimal treatment regimens, particularly when considering sequential therapies, is crucial for improving patient outcomes,” the study authors wrote in a poster presentation of the data. “This study [aimed to compare the [efficacy] of fruquintinib sequential regorafenib [vs] regorafenib sequential fruquintinib in [the] late-line treatment of [patients with] metastatic CRC.”
In November 2023, the FDA approved fruquintinib for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic CRC who previously received fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-VEGF therapy, and, if RAS wild-type and medically appropriate, an anti-EGFR therapy.2
The study included adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic CRC.1 Patients were also required to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and have received at least 2 prior lines of standard therapy. Eligible patients received either FR or RF therapy.
At baseline, the median age in the FR and RF groups was 56 years (range, 32-78) vs 60.5 years (range, 39-71), respectively. Most patients in both groups had RAS wild-type disease (62.86% vs 61.11%) and had metastatic disease in the lung (54.29% vs 61.11%), liver (71.43% vs 72.22%), and/or multiple sites (77.14% vs 72.22%). All patients in both groups had BRAF wild-type disease and most patients in both groups received prior bevacizumab (Avastin; 80.0% vs 66.67%).
The primary end point was median OS. Secondary end points included median progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.
Additional data demonstrated that fruquintinib before sequential therapy led to a median PFS of 4.4 months compared with 3.7 months for regorafenib in the overall population (P = .014). In the combination therapy population, the median PFS was 7.3 months vs 3.7 months, respectively (P = .035). The overall response rate for fruquintinib before sequential therapy in the overall population was 11.43% compared with 0% for regorafenib. The respective disease control rates were 82.86% and 11.11%. Data from a subgroup analysis revealed that FR therapy led to a median OS benefit vs RF treatment in most evaluated patient subgroups.
“In the late-line treatment of [patients with] metastatic CRC, the sequencing strategy of initial fruquintinib followed by regorafenibmay demonstrate superior clinical outcomes compared [with] the reverse sequence, especially in [the] combination therapy population or in the third-line [of] treatment,” the study authors wrote in their conclusion. “[Our] sample size was relatively limited. [The] sample size should be increased to further validate [these] findings.”
Disclosures: All authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Related Content: