2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
A recap of the top data presented at the 2025 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.
The 2025 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium wrapped up on Saturday following 3 days of impactful presentations highlighting emerging data from across the field.
In case you missed them in San Francisco, here are some of the top abstracts presented at this year’s meeting. Check out full coverage of the meeting here.
Treatment with the combination of nivolumab (Opdivo) plus ipilimumab (Yervoy) led to a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) vs lenvatinib (Lenvima) or sorafenib (Nexavar) in patients with previously untreated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to data from the phase 3 CheckMate 9DW study (NCT04039607).1
The median OS was 23.7 months for patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 20.6 months for those given lenvatinib or sorafenib (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; P = .018).
The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab produced an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) vs nivolumab alone across all lines of therapy in patients with mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), according to data from the phase 3 CheckMate 8HW trial (NCT04008030).2
The median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 53.8 months-not evaluable [NE]) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 39.3 months (95% CI, 22.1-NE) for nivolumab monotherapy (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.81; P = .0003).
The addition of encorafenib (Braftovi) and cetuximab (Erbitux) to standard-of-care mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) generated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall response rate (ORR) compared with mFOLFOX6 alone in patients with BRAF V600E–mutated mCRC, according to data from the phase 3 BREAKWATER trial (NCT04607421).3
The ORR was 60.9% (95% CI, 51.6%-69.5%) with the combination (n = 110) vs 40.0% (95% CI, 31.3%-49.3%) for mFOLFOX6 alone (n = 110; odds ratio, 2.443; 95% CI, 1.403-4.253; one-sided P = .0008). These data supported the December 2024 FDA accelerated approval of encorafenib in combination with cetuximab and mFOLFOX6 for the treatment of patients with mCRC harboring a BRAF V600E mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test.
Dose reductions of liposomal irinotecan (Onivyde) and oxaliplatin did not negatively affect OS outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) during the phase 3 NAPOLI 3 trial (NCT04083235), according to exploratory post hoc findings from the study.4
Patients who required dose reductions of liposomal irinotecan experienced a median OS of 12.6 months (95% CI, 11.0-14.5) vs 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.5) for those without a dose reduction. Similarly, patients receiving dose reductions of oxaliplatin achieved a median OS of 13.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-15.2) vs 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.2-10.2) in patients who did not receive a dose reduction of the agent.
Three-year treatment with aspirin was associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrence compared with placebo in patients with PIK3CA-mutated CRC, according to data from the phase 3 ALASCCA trial (NCT02647099).5
The risk of disease recurrence was reduced by 51% in patients with PIK3CA exon 9/20 mutations (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.98; P = .044) and by 58% in patients with PIK3R1, PTEN, or other PIK3CA alterations (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.83; P = .013).
Cabozantinib (Cabometyx) generated an improvement in PFS vs placebo in patients with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with a primary tumor arising in the gastrointestinal tract whose disease progressed on prior therapy, according to subgroup data from the phase 3 CABINET trial (NCT03375320).6
In the cohort of patients with extrapancreatic NETs with a primary tumor arising in the gastrointestinal tract, the median PFS was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.0-16.7) for cabozantinib compared with 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-11.0) for placebo (stratified HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88; 1-sided stratified log-rank P = .007).
Treatment with intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 (NIPS) boosted OS compared with intravenous paclitaxel and S-1 alone (PS) in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, according to data from the phase 3 DRAGON-01 trial (ChiCTR-IIR-16009802).7
NIPS generated a median OS of 19.4 months (95% CI, 17.1-22.9) vs 13.9 months (95% CI, 10.3-16.1) for PS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.88; P = .0056).
The addition of Pelareorep to mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil) with or without atezolizumab (Tecentriq) demonstrated safety with no new signals in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic PDAC, according to findings from cohort 5 of the safety run-in portion of the ongoing phase 1/2 GOBLET study (Eudra-CT:2020-003996-16).8
A positive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status was strongly associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes vs negative ctDNA status in patients with stage III resected colon cancer, according to findings from a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80702 trial (NCT01150045).9
Notably, DFS outcomes were significantly improved with celecoxib (Celebrex) vs placebo in patients with ctDNA-positive disease.
Treatment with the combination of camrelizumab, rivoceranib, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) led to a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC, according to findings from the phase 2 CARES-005 trial (NCT04559607).10
Patients treated with the combination achieved a median PFS of 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.8-13.7) vs 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.4-4.2) for those given TACE alone (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50; P < .0001).
A subset of patients with stage IV CRC experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in DFS when treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102; Lonsurf) vs placebo; however, TAS-102 did not generate a statistically significant improvement in DFS in the full population of patients, according to data from the phase 3 ALTAIR study (NCT04457297).11
In all patients, the median DFS 9.30 months (7.92-10.84) for TAS-102 vs 5.55 months (4.17-7.33) for placebo (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.05; P = .107). In the subset of patients with stage IV disease, the median DFS was 9.76 months (95% CI, 7.62-11.76) and 3.96 months (95% CI, 3.71-7.98), respectively (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.87; P = .012).
Related Content: