2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Lung cancer experts share upcoming, potentially practice-informing clinical trials that are expected to read out in the second half of 2025.
The non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment paradigm is rapidly evolving, with multiple clinical trials poised to reshape standards of care for several patient subgroups. OncLive® asked leading lung cancer experts to share the research and readouts they’re most highly anticipating over the next few months. We heard from:
Read more about these pivotal trials and why these experts are keeping a close eye on the pending findings.
The phase 3 DESTINY-Lung04 trial (NCT05048797) is a first-line study evaluating fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (Enhertu)—an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)—against the widely used phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 trial (NCT02578680) regimen of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in patients with HER2-mutated NSCLC, Nagasaka said.1 The findings from this trial are especially anticipated because HER2 alterations are a target of growing interest, Nagasaka added. Positive results could mark the first time an ADC becomes a preferred first-line therapy in this population, potentially changing practice standards, Nagasaka noted.
The phase 3 Beamion LUNG-2 study (NCT06151574) is testing the HER2-targeted TKI zongertinib (BI 1810631) compared with the KEYNOTE-189 regimen in patients with HER2-mutated NSCLC.2 This trial will determine whether moving HER2 TKIs earlier in the treatment paradigm offers efficacy advantages, Nagasaka stated.
Similar to Beamion LUNG-2, the phase 1/2 SOHO-01 (NCT05099172) and phase 3 SOHO-02 (NCT06452277) trials are also exploring a HER2-targeted TKI—sevabertinib (BAY 2927088)—in patients with HER2-mutated NSCLC. SOHO-01 evaluated the agent in patients with pretreated, advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC who were naive to HER2-targeted therapy, or those not exposed to any therapy for advanced disease.3 The agent was associated with a manageable safety profile. Additionally, the objective response rates in patients with progressive disease and those naive to treatment for advanced disease, respectively, were 59.3% (95% CI, 47.8%-70.1%) and 59.0% (95% CI, 42.1%-74.4%). The ongoing, randomized SOHO-02 trial is investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line sevabertinib vs the KEYNOTE-189 regimen in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring HER2 activating mutations.4
The phase 3 FLAURA2 trial (NCT04035486) evaluated the combination of osimertinib (Tagrisso) and platinum-based chemotherapy vs osimertinib alone in patients with first-line EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.5 Prior data from this study supported the February 2024 FDA approval of osimertinib plus platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test.6
A July 2025 news release announced an overall survival (OS) advantage with the combination over osimertinib alone, although exact hazard ratios and statistical details remain undisclosed and will be shared at a future medical meeting.7 Historically, findings from the phase 3 FLAURA trial (NCT02296125) established osimertinib as the first-linestandard of care (SOC) for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC,8 and data with the FLAURA2 regimen indicate a further survival improvement. Langer stated that he is eager to see whether this OS benefit is comparable with or exceeds that seen in studies of amivantamab-vmjw (Rybrevant) plus lazertinib (Lazcluze) in this population.
The phase 3 HARMONi-2 study (NCT05499390) is investigating ivonescimab (SMT112)—a PD-1 x VEGF bispecific antibody—vs pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, PD-L1–positive NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK mutations.9 Although progression-free survival data from this trial have been presented and favored the ivonescimab arm across patient subgroups, including those with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1% to 49% (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78) and a PD-L1 TPS of at least 50% (HR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.79), the OS results are still pending. The outcomes from this trial might inform sequencing strategies in this population, according to Reckamp.
The phase 3 TRITON trial (NCT06008093) is comparing pembrolizumab plus standard chemoimmunotherapy vs a 4-drug regimen that adds dual checkpoint blockade with durvalumab (Imfinzi) and tremelimumab (Imjudo) to chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC with STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS mutations or co-mutations.10 This combination is hypothesized to improve outcomes, particularly in patients with PD-L1–low tumors and/or co-mutations in STK11 or KEAP1, Langer explained.
The phase 3 INSIGNIA trial (NCT03793179) is a cooperative group study comparing single-agent pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab plus chemoimmunotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with PD-L1 expression of 1% to 49%.11 A second randomization will assess whether continuing pembrolizumab beyond progression with chemotherapy improves outcomes, Langer reported. The trial will clarify whether all PD-L1–positive patients truly need chemotherapy up-front or whether some can avoid it, he continued.
The experts underscored that NSCLC management is entering an era of unprecedented complexity. Researchers are pushing targeted therapies, ADCs, and immunotherapy combinations into the first-line setting. Treatment sequencing strategies will become a central challenge in the future. The field is also grappling with information overload, as results from these trials could rapidly shift practice patterns and prompt oncologists to rethink longstanding treatment algorithms.
Related Content: