2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Ahead of the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, experts in gastrointestinal cancers provide their top anticipated studies they will be watching for at the meeting.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD
As the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting comes into focus, OncLive® spoke with expert investigators in the field of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers to gain their insights on the research updates they are most excited to see presented during the meeting.
We gathered expert commentary from:
The investigators highlighted over 10 studies in the GI space to be on the lookout for during the meeting and explained their potential effects on clinical practice.
Session time: June 1, 1:05-1:17 pm CDT
Amit Mahipal, MD
Bekaii-Saab: If positive, this study may change the landscape of how we treat [patients with] mismatch repair–deficient [dMMR]/microsatellite instability–high [MSI-H] stage III, and potentially high-risk stage II, colon cancer in the adjuvant setting. [The questions] this study will not help answer are: Do we need chemotherapy? [What is the] optimal duration [of chemotherapy]? Do we need to expose patients for more than 6 months given what we know from neoadjuvant studies? Will there be an overall survival [OS] benefit? The latter is very important given the cost implications of adjuvant immuno-oncology [IO] therapy. [It will also not address the question of] whether we can better select patients who may benefit from IO.
Mahipal: This study could change the standard of care [SOC] for [patients with] resected dMMR/MSI-H colon cancer.
Session time: May 30, 2:45-2:57 pm CDT
Christine M. Parseghian, MD
Parseghian: I am looking forward to seeing the updated survival data coming out of the phase 3 BREAKWATER trial [NCT04607421] of first-line encorafenib [Braftovi] plus cetuximab [Erbitux] and mFOLFOX6 [fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin] in [patients with] BRAF V600E–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer [CRC]. This study previously met one of its primary end points with an improvement in objective response rate [(ORR) vs chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (Avastin)], resulting in accelerated approval from the FDA of the regimen in the frontline setting for this very aggressive subpopulation of patients with metastatic CRC.1 Further survival data will hopefully solidify the consistent use of this regimen in patients with treatment-naive disease.
Bekaii-Saab: This regimen was recently approved by the FDA through its accelerated mechanism based on the ORR benefit. Data to be presented at ASCO will include progression-free survival and updated OS data which may allow for a full approval if meaningfully positive. We also await the results of the FOLFIRI [5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan]-based combination in the near future.
Session time: June 1, 3:13-3:25 pm CDT
Bekaii-Saab: A recent press release disclosed that the primary end point of EFS was met and OS was improved, as a trend at least.2 The relevance of an end point such as EFS remains controversial, especially in the absence of a strong OS benefit, and as such it is best to interpret the results of this study with caution until the final OS analysis is disclosed.
Mahipal: Although OS data will be pending, if this is a positive trial and depending on magnitude of benefit, FLOT [fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel] plus durvalumab [Imfinzi] could become a new SOC for [patients with] localized gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Session time: May 31, 3:00-3:12 pm CDT
Bekaii-Saab: Previous [data from] this study suggested a positive outcome from administration of nivolumab [Opdivo] in the adjuvant setting. Questions that remain include [the magnitude of the] OS benefit. If [the data are] positive, and with data from the [phase 3] MATTERHORN trial [NCT04592913] also being presented, will the strategy of the [phase 3] CheckMate 577 trial [NCT02743494] make further sense vs chemoimmunotherapy?
Session time: May 31, 4:36-4:48 pm CDT
Bekaii-Saab: This was a positive large phase 2 randomized study. A recent press release suggested positive OS outcomes and as such it met its primary [end point].3 The goal will be to confirm these results in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial that, if positive, will create a new SOC in this disease that desperately needs better ones.
Session time: May 31, 4:24-4:36 pm CDT
Bekaii-Saab: A recent press release announced positive results with the study [achieving] OS benefit.4 With these positive results we may have an approval in [patients with] locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Session time: May 30, 4:45-4:57 pm CDT
Parseghian: I am anticipating the long-term safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b CodeBreaK 101 trial [NCT04185883] in patients with previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated metastatic CRC receiving sotorasib [Lumakras] plus panitumumab [Vectibix] and FOLFIRI. We saw in the phase 3 CodeBreaK 300 trial [NCT05198934] that the combination of sotorasib and panitumumab improved clinical outcomes, resulting in the FDA approval of this regimen in the chemotherapy-refractory setting.5 However, CodeBreaK 101 was the first study to evaluate the combination with FOLFIRI. If these data remain promising, then the ongoing phase 3 CodeBreaK 301 study [NCT06252649] evaluating this combination vs SOC in the first-line setting may be practice changing.
Session time: May 31, 9:00 am-12:00 pm CDT
Enrique Velazquez Villarreal, MD, PhD, MPH, MS
Velazquez Villarreal: This is one of the important studies where we are addressing an unmet need in [patients with] refractory CRC. We know that patients with anti–EGFR-refractory metastatic CRC have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis once tumors develop resistance to EGFR inhibitors such as cetuximab. Therapeutic alternatives are scarce. This study explores new combinations that could overcome resistance mechanisms and improve outcomes.
Session time: May 31, 9:00 am-12:00 pm CDT
Velazquez Villarreal: This is a study of a major group of patients with CRC who are resistant to immunotherapy. MSS/pMMR disease accounts for [approximately] 90% of cases of CRC. [This study] is largely looking at [patients who] are not responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, and there is a pressing need to unlock immune sensitivity in this large patient population. This study explores a novel immunomodulatory combination [consisting of] EO4010, a next-generation immunomodulatory agent, and nivolumab. This [approach] aims to prime the immune system and enhance T-cell activation in immune-cold tumors.
Session time: May 31, 9:00 am-12:00 pm CDT
Velazquez Villarreal: This [study] is important because it's highlighting the rising incidence of CRC in young adults. Young-onset CRC, which is diagnosed before the age of 50 [years old], has been increasing globally, whereas overall rates of CRC diagnosis have declined. [There are] questions about whether younger patients respond differently to treatment compared with older patients, and I believe there's a difference in tumor biology. There is emerging evidence that suggests that young-onset CRC may involve distinct molecular features [such as] MSI-H, germline mutations, or hypermethylation compared with late-onset CRC. Understanding whether these biological differences translate into viable responses to therapy is essential for tailoring treatment.
Session time: May 31, 9:00 am-12:00 pm CDT
Velazquez Villarreal: This is a disease subtype that is highly resistant to current immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. MSI-H tumors often respond [well to] anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 agents, but MSS tumors have remained largely unresponsive.
[Vilastobart has] an innovative mechanism of action that is basically tumor activated. [It is] an Fc-enhanced anti–CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody. This design allows for localized activation within the tumor microenvironment, potentially minimizing systemic toxicities, which are a major limitation of conventional CTLA-4 blockade, and enhanced antitumor immune activity. This research is important because it investigates a novel immunotherapy combination for [patients with] MSS CRC, a subtype that currently lacks effective immunotherapy options.
Related Content: