2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Breast oncology experts discuss SABCS 2025 data from HER2CLIMB-05 and lidERA that may influence maintenance therapy and adjuvant endocrine care.
The 2025 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) delivered clinically meaningful data across breast cancer subtypes, highlighting advances in HER2-targeted maintenance strategies and next-generation endocrine therapy in early-stage disease.
Key phase 3 presentations from SABCS included findings from the HER2CLIMB-05 trial (NCT05132582), which evaluated tucatinib (Tukysa) vs placebo in combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and pertuzumab (Perjeta) as maintenance therapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as well as results from the lidERA Breast Cancer trial (NCT04961996), which compared the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs standard-of-care (SOC) adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.1,2
OncLive® spoke with leading breast cancer specialists throughout the meeting to capture their perspectives on the most influential presentations and how these findings may translate into near-term clinical practice. Read on for insights from:
Bardia: I was excited to see the results of HER2CLIMB-05, which showed that the addition of tucatinib plus trastuzumab/pertuzumab is associated with improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). If approved, [this combination] could [be] another treatment option for patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.
Audi Blotta: The ASCENT-07 trial evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) in the first-line setting after endocrine therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The results were negative in terms of PFS, but this [trial answered] an important clinical question, even with negative results.
Mayer: The abstract I’m thinking about the most is [lidERA], as this is the first endocrine treatment that we’ve had in 25 years to demonstrate benefit in the early-stage setting. This is a groundbreaking finding, but I would add that the report from [lidERA] is the first from a host of incredibly large adjuvant oral SERD studies.
Some of these trials are enrolling patients immediately at the time when they initiate adjuvant endocrine therapy. Some of them are enrolling patients over more of an extended duration, 2 to 5 years out from starting endocrine therapy. There are trials that also incorporate CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Over the next few years, as we see readouts from these trials, this is going to influence how we make decisions for patients in the adjuvant setting. It may also begin to tell us that we’re going to sweep away aromatase inhibitors and enter into a setting where oral SERDs are our preferred option for patients—a selection that may improve efficacy, tolerability, and adherence, and hopefully allow us to cure more patients with breast cancer. We’re seeing the prelude to what’s going to be an extraordinary next few years in breast cancer.
Hamilton: One of the datasets that is potentially practice changing is the [lidERA] data around adjuvant [giredestrant]. This was exciting, mainly because we haven’t had a change in endocrine backbones in excess of 20 years. I see a lot of people saying we haven’t had changes to adjuvant endocrine therapy, and I don’t completely agree with that. We have had the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors—both [abemaciclib (Verzenio)] and [ribociclib (Kisqali)].
However, to see an approximate 3% benefit already at this first initial look at 36 months of follow-up in an all-comer population not selected for [ESR1 mutations] is validating for the oral SERDs. We have some difficult decisions ahead of us, because it’s hard to consider giving up the benefit of an adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor. There are going to have to be some conversations with patients. But ultimately, CDK4/6 inhibitors have a bit more magnitude of benefit and a bit longer follow-up.
Cristofanilli: I agree that lidERA is probably the most impactful news of the [meeting], because we didn’t have an agent approved that setting—except for a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the adjuvant setting—for a long time. We are all excited about how the field is changing. The SOC is changing. The comparison is changing. Where we place [giredestrant] in the context of the treatment we have right now with CDK4/6 inhibitors will be a great debate in the months and hopefully even in the years to come. Having new opportunities for treatment is important for patients with breast cancer.
Related Content: