2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Experts preview abstracts being presented at IMS, highlighting the role of MRD, bispecific antibodies, and other strategies to refine myeloma management.
The 22nd International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting, taking place September 17–20, 2025, in Toronto, Canada, will highlight key advances across multiple myeloma research, including progress in precursor disease profiling and management, risk-adapted management strategies, immunotherapy optimization, and strategies for patients experiencing early relapse.1 Additional sessions will spotlight late-breaking data on the predictive role of minimal residual disease (MRD), the efficacy of novel bispecific antibody combinations, and approaches for high-risk disease.
In exclusive interviews with OncLive®, experts shared what they are most looking forward to seeing presented at the meeting, underscoring data that could inform future treatment paradigms and refine standards of care.
Exclusive insights were gathered from:
“The IMS Annual Meeting has become an important meeting for the myeloma community,” Usmani expressed. “For the past couple years, several clinical trials that had not been presented at any other international congresses were being presented here. I’m hoping it will be an exciting 4 days for us, and that all of us will learn from the data being shared and come up with new ideas for our respective teams to continue to move the field forward.”
Read on for more commentary on abstracts to watch!
“I’m looking forward to having more granularity around the dynamics of how patients get to MRD negativity, [including the pace of response, the depth and durability of remission, and how these patterns may inform treatment sequencing and de-escalation strategies in multiple myeloma],” Usmani noted.
Several studies being presented in this year’s program are exploring the dynamics of achieving MRD negativity in clinical practice, aiming to better define its prognostic significance and therapeutic implications. These include:
“I’m excited [about] the translational data [emerging from early-phase and ongoing studies] with bispecific and trispecific antibodies, [which are advancing in clinical trials and showing potential to reshape treatment strategies by targeting multiple tumor antigens simultaneously],” Usmani highlighted.
“One of the things we’ve learned over the past few years is the importance of 2 main targets: BCMA and GPRC5D,” Richter added. “We’ve seen this with several CAR T-cell [therapies] and bispecific antibodies that have been approved. With the phase 1/2 RedirecTT-1 trial [NCT04586426], we saw that when we combined these 2 targets by giving both talquetamab [Talvey] and teclistamab-cqyv [Tecvayli], we observed unprecedented response rates [in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma], especially in patients with harder-to-treat extramedullary disease.
“The question is: Can we achieve the same [effect] with 1 drug instead of multiple drugs—maintaining those response rates but reducing adverse effects? That’s what both the [SIM0500 (formerly SCR-8572)] and [JNJ-79635322] BCMA/GPRC5D/CD3-directed trispecific antibodies are aiming to do. So far, we’re starting to see hints that these are highly efficacious and well [tolerated]. Overall, these agents are going to be part of the future of myeloma management.”
Notably, in a prior OncLive interview, Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD, of University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom, explained the efficacy findings from a phase 1 trial (NCT05652335) investigating JNJ-79635322 in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.4
“Another trispecific antibody—ISB 2001—is a CD38/BCMA/CD3-directed construct,” Richter stated. “One of the challenges with GPRC5D is that the on-target, off-tumor effects can be difficult to tolerate, including dysgeusia and rash; because of [this target’s] expression in the olivary nucleus, there may also be ataxia. Adding another antigen, CD38—a tried-and-true target in myeloma—seems like a good option. These data were presented [at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting] by Hang Quach, MD [at St Vincent’s Hospital in Melbourne, Australia]. I’m excited about these and other assets that are coming along, because the key question is whether we can find the perfect balance of efficacy and toxicity—but with a single drug.”
Multiple studies being presented in this year’s program are investigating the translational effects of bispecific and trispecific antibody therapies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, with a focus on efficacy, resistance mechanisms, and immune correlates of response1:
“I’m looking forward toan update on the [BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy anitocabtagene autoleucel (anito-cel; CART-ddBCMA)] in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, which] should be interesting,” Parekh spotlighted.
Several presentations in this year’s program will focus on future targets and emerging therapeutic modalities, including this presentation on anito-cel:
Related Content: