2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Andreas Saltos, MD, discusses final results from a phase 2 trial of first-line pembrolizumab plus vorinostat in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.
Andreas Saltos, MD, medical director, Clinical Research, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, discusses final results from a phase 2 trial (NCT02638090) of first-line pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus vorinostat (Zolinza) in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).
A phase 2 trial randomly assigned patients with treatment-naïve mNSCLC to receive pembrolizumab with or without the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat. The primary end point of this trial was overall response rate (ORR), with duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as key secondary end points.
In this trial, pembrolizumab plus vorinostat elicited a numerically higher ORR compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy, although this difference was not statistically significant, Saltos says. Of the evaluable patients, the ORR was 44% in the combination arm vs 28% in the monotherapy arm (P = .18). In the monotherapy arm, 37.5% and 35% of patients had best responses of stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), respectively. In the combination arm, 32.6% and 19.6% of patients had best responses of SD and PD, respectively, and 6.5% were not evaluable.
This numerically higher ORR in the combination arm did not translate to a statistically significant difference in PFS or OS, with log-rank P values of .8 and .49, respectively, according to Saltos.
The investigators evaluated RNA sequencing results from tumor biopsies obtained prior to treatment and 2 to 3 weeks after treatment initiation, Saltos explains. In this evaluation, both arms had significant increases in types I and II interferon pathways, as well as upregulations of the interferon target genes STAT1, CXCL9, and CXCL10, Saltos says. A significant difference in the downregulation of cell cycle proteins was observed between the 2 arms, which may be consistent with the mechanism of action of vorinostat, Saltos concludes.
Related Content: