2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, discusses the rationale for of the phase 1b/2 EV-103 trial in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, professor of medicine and urology, coleader, Cancer Signaling Networks, Yale Cancer Center, discusses the rationale for of the phase 1b/2 EV-103 trial (NCT03288545) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
The EV-103 trial focused on patients with MIBC who were not eligible to receive cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Petrylak says. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the current standard of care for those eligible in the patient population, and approximately one-third of those patients will achieve a pathological complete response, Petrylak adds. Cisplatin has been demonstrated to improve survival when compared with cystectomy alone in those with locally advanced muscle invasive disease, Petrylak explains.
The EV-103 study identified cisplatin-ineligible patients who predominately presented with poor renal function, Petrylak notes. They were administered enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (Padcev) for 3 cycles. Moreover, the cycles were adjusted so patients received the therapy on days 1 and 8, rather than days 1, 8, and 15, which is approved the approved regimen for metastatic patients, Petrylak concludes.
Related Content: