Dr Gay on Efficacy Findings From the IsKia Trial in Multiple Myeloma

Francesca Gay, MD, PhD, discusses the safety and efficacy findings derived from the phase 3 IsKia trial in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Francesca Gay, MD, PhD, associate professor, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, the University of Torino, hematologist, the Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, discusses the safety and efficacy findings derivedfrom the phase 3 IsKia trial (NCT04483739) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

The IsKia trial, findings from which were presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting, revealed that the combination of isatuximab-irfc (Sarclisa), carfilzomib (Kyprolis), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) significantly increased minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates at the 10-5 and 10-6 cutoffs post-consolidation compared with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) in newly diagnosed patients. At a median follow-up of 21 months, MRD negativity rates at the 10-5 cutoff post-consolidation were 77% in the Isa-KRd arm (n = 151) vs 67% in the KRd arm (n = 151; OR, 1.67; P = .049). At the 10-6 cutoff, the MRD negativity rates were 67% and 48%, respectively (OR, 2.29; P < .001).

As such the trial’s primary end point, MRD negativity by next-generation sequencing after autologous stem cell transplant consolidation, was significantly higher with Isa-KRd vs KRd. Adverse effects (AEs), primarily hematological, were well managed in both arms. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent MRD negativity benefits with Isa-KRd vs KRd across risk groups.

Gay states that in the trial, Isa-KRD elicited a significantly higher rate of MRD negativity compared with KRd. This difference was evident at both the 10-5 and the 10-6 cutoffs, indicating a deep level of MRD negativity with Isa-KRd, she explains. Gay goes on to say that a key secondary end point of the study was the rate of MRD negativity after induction, which again favored Isa-KRd over KRd. At the 10-5 cutoff, the MRD negativity rates post-induction were 45% vs 26% in the Isa-KRd and KRd arms, respectively (OR, 2.34; P < .001), and at the 10-6 cutoff, these rates were 27% vs 14%, respectively (OR, 2.36; P = .004). MRD negativity rates improved over time after transplant and consolidation, Gay continues.

Approximately 40% of patients in the Isa-KRd arm and 30% of those in the KRd arm experienced grade 3/4 hematologic AEs, primarily neutropenia (36% vs 22%, respectively), she states. However, the infection rates were comparable between the 2 arms, Gay explains. Notably, there were no grade 3/4 neuropathy events, and the rate of cardiovascular toxicity was low, she concludes.