2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Neelam Desai, MD, discusses the role of a palbociclib-containing regimen in HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
“The data are compelling—I certainly would consider adding palbociclib in the maintenance phase for patients who [have] both hormone receptor–positive and HER2-positive metastatic disease.”
Neelam Desai, MD, a breast medical oncologist and hematologist at the Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, discussed the role of palbociclib (Ibrance) plus anti-HER2 therapy and endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Data from the phase 3 AFT-38 PATINA trial (NCT02947685) are compelling, as the investigators concluded that the combination of palbociclib, anti-HER2 therapy, and ET could represent a new standard of care for patients with HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, Desai began. Following these findings, she noted that this regimen could be one she considers as maintenance therapy for her patients with HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
At a data cutoff of October 15, 2024, patients (n = 518) were randomly assigned to either receive palbociclib plus trastuzumab (Herceptin) or pertuzumab (Perjeta) and ET (n = 261), or anti-HER2 therapy plus ET alone (n = 257). Of note, the final progression-free survival (PFS) analysis was performed after 262 events and 53 months of median follow-up. Data demonstrated that palbociclib plus anti-HER2 and ET significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.94; 1-sided P = .0074). Notably, the median PFS was 44.3 months (95% CI, 32.4-60.9) vs 29.1 months (95% CI, 23.3-38.6) in the palbociclib and control arms, respectively. The confirmed objective response rate was 29.2% compared with 22.2% (P = .0458), with a clinical benefit rate of 89.3% vs 81.3% (2-sided P = .0106).
Adverse effects occurred most frequently in patients in the palbociclib arm, specifically grade 3 neutropenia (63.2%). More patients from the palbociclib arm also experienced grades 2 and 3 fatigue (grade 2, 22.9%; grade 3, 5.4%), stomatitis (17.2%; 4.2%), and diarrhea (25.4%; 11.1%).
Treatment with palbociclib was generally well-tolerated in the study, and there were no new safety signals, which demonstrated a potential option for the respective patient population, Desai concluded.
Related Content: