2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Evandro D. Bezerra, MD, discusses real-world outcomes associated with brexucabtagene autoleucel in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Evandro D. Bezerra, MD, hematologic oncologist, the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James, discusses real-world outcomes associated with brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus; brexu-cel) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).
At the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting, investigators presented findings from a real-world investigation of the impact of the CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy brexu-cel in patients with B-ALL from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Registry. In 2021, brexu-cel received FDA approval for use in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL, based on data from the phase 1/2 ZUMA-3 clinical trial (NCT02614066), Bezerra states. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of patients treated with brexu-cel in a real-world setting to determine whether the results aligned with those observed in ZUMA-3, Bezerra explains.
It is common for significant differences in patient characteristics to exist between real-world and clinical trial patient populations, he expands. An important initial finding of this real-world study was that 90% of patients might not have met the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the ZUMA-3 clinical trial, Bezerra elucidates. Despite this substantial difference in the patient population, brexu-cel was effective in the real-world setting, and generated high rates of complete remission (CR), he notes. At 6 months, the overall survival rate was 79% (95% CI, 71%-85%).
Initially, investigators hypothesized that the real-world study might reveal different response rates or toxicity profiles with brexu-cel vs those observed in ZUMA-3 due to potential variations in patient characteristics between the 2 populations, Bezerra continues. However, investigators found that the rates of CR without hematological recovery with brexu-cel in the real-world population were consistent with those observed in the clinical trial population, he says. Despite the significant differences between the clinical trial and real-world patient populations, the efficacy of brexu-cel in this real-world analysis remained consistent with the outcomes seen in the clinical trial, Bezerra concludes.
Related Content: