Dr Baljevic on Selinexor Plus Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone in R/R Myeloma

Muhamed Baljevic, MD, discusses the efficacy and safety of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

"Lower weekly dosing also facilitated median exposure time of the drug to be higher and the intensity to be higher, which is probably the reason why the long-term disease outcomes were, in fact, better. [with the 40-mg dose of selinexor vs the 60-mg dose]."

Muhamed Baljevic, MD, FACP, hematologist, medical oncologist, associate professor, medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, director, Plasma Cell Disorders Research, director, Vanderbilt Amyloidosis Multidisciplinary Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; co-chair, the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Protocol Review and Monitoring System, discusses findings from the phase 1/1b STOMP trial (NCT02343042) evaluating the efficacy and safety of selinexor (Xpovio) in combination with pomalidomide (Pomalyst) and dexamethasone (SPd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

This trial assessed 3 selinexor dosing regimens: 40 mg once weekly (SPd-40), 60 mg once weekly (SPd-60), and 60/80 mg twice weekly (SPd-60/80). Pomalidomide was evaluated at 2 mg, 3 mg, or 4 mg once per day.

Findings presented at the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting showed that patients in the SPd-40 cohort (n = 16) achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 43.8% (95% CI, 19.8%-70.1%) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) that was not evaluable (NE; 95% CI, 8.3-NE). The ORRs were 55.0% (95% CI, 31.5%-76.9%) and 38.9% (95% CI, 17.3%-64.3%) for the SPd-60 (n = 20) and SPd-60/80 (n = 18) cohorts, respectively. The respective median PFS in these groups were of 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.7-NE) and 10.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-NE).

Regarding safety, the most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) reported in the SPd-40 cohort included neutropenia (75.0%), anemia (31.%), and thrombocytopenia (25.0%). These rates were lower than those observed in the SPd-60 and SPd-60/80 BIW cohorts, where grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 75.0% and 50.0% of patients, respectively. Additionally, no grade 5 adverse events were reported in the SPd-40 cohort.

Baljevic highlights that the although the ORR was higher in the SPd-60 group, patients in the SPd-40 group experienced a longer median PFS. Compared with the SPd-60 regimen, the SPd-40 regimen was also associated with a longer median treatment exposure (28.0 weeks vs 22.0 weeks) and a higher median relative dose intensity (91.3% vs 77.5%). These findings may explain why the long-term disease outcomes were improved in the SPd-40 cohort, he concludes.