2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Idoroenyi Amanam, MD, discusses the efficacy of first-line luspatercept vs erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in real-world patients with lower-risk MDS.
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
"We think that what we’ve seen in the COMMANDS trial in terms of survival benefit—and how that translates into the real-world setting—clearly demonstrates that luspatercept is a highly effective therapy for these patients."
Idoroenyi Amanam, MD, an assistant professor in the Division of Leukemia in the Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation at City of Hope, discussed findings from a real-world study of first-line luspatercept-aamt (Reblozyl) compared with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), highlighting clinically meaningful improvements in transfusion independence and hemoglobin response.
In a retrospective United States–based cohort study, 360 patients with lower-risk MDS were identified, including 186 who initiated luspatercept and 174 who received ESAs in the first-line setting. Among these, 236 patients (luspatercept, n = 119; ESAs, n = 117) had evaluable data for hemoglobin levels and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during the first 6 months of treatment and were included in the primary analysis. The composite end point was defined as achieving or maintaining RBC transfusion independence for at least 12 weeks alongside a hemoglobin level increase of at least 1.5 g/dL from baseline at any time during the first 6 months of index treatment.
Of the eligible population, 63.0% of patients treated with luspatercept met the composite end point, compared with 35.9% of those receiving ESAs (P < .001). After adjusting for baseline variables, such as International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)/Revised IPSS classification, serum erythropoietin levels, ring sideroblast status, and transfusion burden, the adjusted odds ratio for luspatercept was 3.26 (95% CI, 1.73-6.15), indicating a more than threefold increased likelihood of response relative to that with ESAs.
According to Amanam, these findings reinforce luspatercept’s role as a preferred first-line therapy in lower-risk MDS, particularly in patients with anemia and transfusion dependence. He noted that these data align with prior controlled trial findings, including those from the phase 3 COMMANDS trial (NCT03682536), and provide additional evidence of luspatercept’s benefit in routine clinical practice.
Related Content: