2 Clarke Drive
Suite 100
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Durvalumab plus BCG induction and maintenance therapy yielded clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs BCG induction and maintenance therapy alone in BCG-naive, high-risk NMIBC.
Induction and maintenance therapy with durvalumab (Imfinzi) combined with BCG produced a statistically significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival (DFS) improvement compared with BCG alone in patients with BCG-naive, high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), according to results from the phase 3 POTOMAC trial (NCT03528694) that were presented at the 2025 ESMO Congress.
The findings were presented by Maria De Santis, MD, associate professor at the University of Warwick Medical School in Coventry, England, and simultaneously published in The Lancet.3The open-label, randomized study was made up of 1-018 patients who were randomized 1:1 in 3 cohorts: 339 received 1 year of durvalumab in combination with BCG induction and maintenance therapy, 339 received 1 year of durvalumab with BCG induction only, and 340 received only BCG and induction and maintenance therapy.2
The primary endpoint of DFS was achieved, with a 32% reduction in risk of a DFS event (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50–0.93; P=.0154) with the addition of durvalumab to BCG induction and maintenance. Early and sustained DFS benefit with duravalumab was observed starting as early as 4 months (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P=.0154). The median follow-up was 60.7 months.
However, the different in DFS for durvalumab plus BCG induction only vs BCG induction and maintenance was not statistically significant (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86–1.50; P =.3530). While overall survival (OS) data were immature, there was no detriment to OS with the addition of durvalumab to BCG and induction and maintenance therapy (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53–1.20).
The addition of durvalumab to BCG and induction and maintenance therapy had no major impact on patient-reported quality of life, one of the secondary endpoints of the trial.
Regarding safety, another key secondary end point, the results showed that the durvalumab/BCG regimen was tolerable and manageable with no unexpected toxicities, and there were no deaths possibly related to the study treatment reported. Grade 3 or 4 AEs possibly related to any treatment were reported in 21% of the durvalumab/BCG induction and maintenance arm, 15% of the durvalumab/BCG induction arm, and 4% of the BCG induction and maintenance arm.
The most frequently reported any-grade AEs in the durvalumab/BCG induction and maintenance and BCG-only arms included dysuria (37% vs 36%, respectively), hematuria (32% vs 30%), pollakiuria (26% vs 25%), urinary tract infection (21% vs 18%), cystitis (19%vs 19%), and pyrexia (16%vs 20%).
“Overall, these events were consistent with what we expected for durvalumab and BCG therapy with dysuria, hematuria, and pollakiuria being the 3 most commonly reported in both arms,” said De Santis during the presentation.2
Majority of the patients were male, and the median age was 68. Approximately 64% of patients had papillary disease only. Patients also had high-risk tumors, defined as being either T1, high grade, carcinoma in situ, or multiple and recurrent and large.2
Patients received a median of 6 BCG induction instillations and 14 BCG maintenance instillations, with a maximum of 15 in both arms. More than half of patients received BCG for 18 months.2
“In conclusion, POTOMAC supports 1 year of durvalumab with BCG and induction and maintenance therapy as a potential new treatment in BCG-naive, high-risk NMIBC,” De Santis said during the presentation.2
Disclosures: De Santis declared a consulting or advisory role with AAA, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Bioclin, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ferring, Gilead Sciences, Immunomedics, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, SeaGen, and Thermosome.
Related Content: