A. Timothy Schmidt, MD, discusses data from the subgroup analysis of the IKEMA study of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics that was presented at the American Society of Clinical (ASCO) 2021 Annual Meeting.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
2x
1.75x
1.5x
1.25x
1x, selected
0.75x
0.5x
Chapters
descriptions off, selected
captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
captions off, selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Timothy Schmidt, MD, discusses data from the following presentation:
Subgroup analysis of the phase 3 IKEMA study of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics. (Spicka I, et al. ASCO 2021; June 4–8, 2021)
An interim analysis of the phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated that isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with carfilzomib-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (HR 0.531; 99% CI, 0.318–0.889; P = .0007), with a manageable safety profile.
This subgroup analysis of IKEMA examined efficacy and safety in patients with high-risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), del(17p), and t(14;16) and/or gain(1q21)].
Patients with 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to receive isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone (n = 179) or carfilzomib-dexamethasone (n = 123). High-risk cytogenetics was assessed by central laboratory analysis and defined as ≥1 of the following: del(17p): 50% cutoff; t(4;14) or t(14;16): 30% cutoff. Assessment of gain(1q21) was prespecified as ≥3 copies: 30% cutoff.
Primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points were response rate, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate, and safety.
Of the randomized patients, 23.5% isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone and 25.2% carfilzomib-dexamethasone had ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality (CA); 26.3% isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone and 25.2% carfilzomib- dexamethasone had isolated gain(1q21).
Efficacy results:
The addition of isatuximab to carfilzomib-dexamethasoneimproved PFS, compared with carfilzomib-dexamethasonealone, for patients with ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality and standard-risk patients.
Patients with t(4;14) (HR 0.549; 95% CI, 0.232–1.301) had a more pronounced treatment effect than patients with del(17p) (HR 0.837; 95% CI, 0.281–2.496).
A clear PFS benefit with isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasoneover carfilzomib-dexamethasonewas also seen for patients with isolated gain(1q21) and gain(1q21) combined with other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.
The trend toward improved complete response, ≥very good partial response, and MRD-negativity rates with the addition of isatuximab was more pronounced in patients with gain(1q21) than in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities alone.
Safety results:
Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs carfilzomib-dexamethasone, but the incidence of serious and fatal TEAEs was similar with both arms for high-risk patients.
The addition of isatuximab to carfilzomib-dexamethasone improved PFS in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and disease response in patients with gain(1q21) isolated or combined with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with the benefit observed in the overall IKEMA population. Isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone is a potential new treatment option for the difficult-to-treat subgroup of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics.